{"id":601,"date":"2025-10-03T12:48:11","date_gmt":"2025-10-03T12:48:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/?p=601"},"modified":"2025-10-15T09:46:25","modified_gmt":"2025-10-15T09:46:25","slug":"bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/blog\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne","title":{"rendered":"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions"},"content":{"rendered":"

Interviews<\/a><\/p> –

{{minutes}} min read<\/p>


How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions<\/strong><\/h1> \"\" <\/a>

Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107<\/p><\/a>

October 3, 2025<\/p> \"\"

When in-house agencies first emerged, they had one job: to save money. These were the \u201cservice departments\u201d tasked with delivering assets quickly and at lower rates. A retailer might have relied on them for catalogues or point-of-sale, while a broadcaster used them for promos. These teams were doers, not leaders<\/strong>\u2014a cost-efficient production arm rather than a driver of strategy.

But that\u2019s no longer the whole story.

We tackled this topic in a recent Bold Session with Patrick Burgoyne<\/strong><\/a>, co-founder of the In-House Agency Leaders Club<\/strong><\/a>, who has watched in-house teams evolve into something far more ambitious. \u201cA lot of in-house teams were set up originally to save money and drive efficiency,\u201d he explains, \u201cbut as those teams have matured \u2026 they\u2019ve become more ambitious for the work and the impact they could have.\u201d

That evolution sets the stage for why in-house agencies exist today: not to produce faster and cheaper, but to act as trusted partners who bring brand knowledge and strategic insight to the table.<\/p>

What Sparks the Move In-House<\/strong><\/h2>

Two forces have always been at the heart of in-housing: cost and speed<\/strong>. External agencies often come with constraints around retainers or project limits, while an in-house setup gives brands the flexibility to handle more requests without additional overhead. As Patrick explains, this efficiency is what made in-house such an attractive option in the first place. But today, the argument extends beyond volume. In-house teams also hold something agencies can never fully replicate: brand knowledge<\/strong>. That knowledge (of products, processes, regulations, and culture) cannot be quickly transferred to an outside partner, and it is now seen as one of the strongest reasons for investing in in-house capability.

The prevalence of in-housing also varies by industry. According to Patrick, it is most common in highly regulated sectors such as insurance, finance, and healthcare, where the stakes are high and the rules are complex. \u201cWhen you\u2019re making communications in those areas, there are so many things you have to know\u2014what you can say, what you cannot, and how it connects back to the brand,\u201d he says. In such contexts, in-house teams provide not just efficiency, but also essential expertise that safeguards both compliance and credibility.<\/p>

Redefining the Role<\/strong><\/h2>

Today\u2019s in-house agencies are no longer content with being the back-office producers of marketing assets. Their ambition is to be recognised as strategic partners<\/strong>, trusted problem-solvers who understand the business inside out. As Patrick puts it, the shift is \u201cgoing from being seen as a service department to being seen as a strategic partner of the business. That\u2019s the path a lot of them are on.\u201d

In-house agencies have something external agencies can\u2019t easily replicate: deep brand knowledge and internal relationships<\/strong>. They carry an everyday understanding of the culture, regulations, and goals of the organisation. That closeness enables them to respond faster, align more closely with business objectives, and anticipate needs in a way outsiders rarely can.

Still, Patrick stresses that there\u2019s no single template for in-housing: \u201cEverybody does in-housing differently. There are overall patterns and trends, but the in-house team for each business is going to be different because it\u2019s responding to the needs of that business.\u201d

In other words, leaders shouldn\u2019t be looking for a universal playbook or a single roadmap to follow. Instead, they should treat other in-house models as benchmarks, not blueprints<\/strong>. The size of the team, the services it offers, and the degree to which it partners with external agencies will always depend on the business\u2019s sector, legacy, and ambitions.

For some, the right approach might be a lean production studio focused on efficiency. For others, it\u2019s building a full-service agency with strategists and conceptual creatives at the helm. The key is to design a model that solves your<\/em> company\u2019s problems, while keeping an eye on industry patterns to avoid reinventing the wheel.<\/p>

Then vs. Now: From Service to Strategy<\/strong><\/h2>

The old way of thinking was simple: in-house meant cheaper and faster. And in many places, that remains true. But for teams that have built credibility over time, the ceiling has lifted dramatically<\/strong>.

As in-house groups grew their knowledge and earned trust, they began asking bigger questions: Why don\u2019t we take on more of this work? Why not originate ideas? Why not lead campaigns rather than just produce them?<\/em>

Patrick points to findings from their 2023 benchmarking survey: \u201cOnly 15% thought of themselves as being a lead agency. But 47% said they would be a lead agency in the future.\u201d In other words, nearly half of in-house agency leaders and senior team members aspire to run campaigns end-to-end.<\/p>

Connect With Agency Peers<\/strong><\/h2>

Access agency-related Circle channels, exchange business insights, and join in on members-only live sessions.<\/p>

Join now<\/p> <\/a> \"\"

The New Role of External Agencies<\/strong><\/h2>

The evolution of in-house agencies doesn\u2019t sideline external agencies. On the contrary, they remain crucial partners. Companies still turn to them for specialist expertise, fresh perspective, and high-end creative talent<\/strong>. In-house leaders themselves often acknowledge the risk of becoming too \u201cinstitutionalised\u201d without outside input.

What has changed is the nature of the relationship. \u201cIt\u2019s no longer the case of external agencies coming in saying \u2018we know best, you just execute,\u2019\u201d Patrick says. \u201cBrands are very mindful now that these partners need to be in a collaborative, mutually respectful relationship where both have strengths.\u201d

That collaboration is now formalised. Requests for proposals regularly include the question: How will you work with our in-house agency?\u2014a scenario that would have been unheard of 20 years ago. As Patrick notes, the balance of power has shifted: it is no longer about dominance, but about clarity of roles and collaboration as equals.

This new reality also has an impact on external agencies. While exact numbers on reduced vendor rosters or budgets vary by brand, Patrick observes a noticeable shift in dynamics. Some companies now use in-house teams as a benchmark, comparing costs and efficiencies directly. \u201cA lot of people do that kind of benchmarking thing to say, \u2018We put a value on our time, and if an external agency had done this project, it would\u2019ve cost 30% more,\u2019\u201d he explains.

The shift has also changed how external agencies approach pitching. \u201cA lot of external agencies, I think, won\u2019t pitch against internal teams, and that\u2019s fair enough,\u201d Patrick says. \u201cAs far as we can see, having them pitch against each other is quite rare. People recognise that it is often a recipe for difficulty down the line.\u201d<\/p>

How In-House Teams Prove Their Value<\/strong><\/h2>

The journey from execution to strategy isn\u2019t achieved overnight. It often begins with small steps: a pilot project<\/strong> with a trusted stakeholder. If that succeeds, others notice\u2014and demand snowballs from there. As Patrick put it: \u201cFind someone you\u2019ve got a good relationship with, convince them to give you a chance. Once that initial trust is earned, the conversation shifts to what else the team can handle.\u201d

Strategic credibility comes with capability. Bringing in senior creative talent<\/strong> and especially strategists<\/strong> unlocks new doors. Strategists help translate marketing briefs into creative opportunities and protect ideas as they move through approvals. And creative leadership is validated through visible wins: \u201cWinning awards still helps<\/strong>,\u201d Patrick points out, \u201cbecause it gains respect internally and leads to more opportunities.\u201d

Some may wonder if senior talent is hard to attract and retain in an in-house agency. However, working for a brand long-term has its appeal. \u201cSenior creatives can get to a point where they want to have real impact on a business. They like the idea of getting under the hood of a brand and really understanding it,\u201d Patrick explains.

But ambition alone isn\u2019t enough for an in-house team to be successful. To be trusted with higher-value work, these teams must first deliver flawlessly on the basics\u2014the day-to-day, high-volume output that keeps the brand running. Without that operational discipline, the bigger ambitions never materialize.<\/p>

What\u2019s Next for In-House Agencies?<\/strong><\/h2>

Looking ahead, there are two forces shaping the next phase of the in-house agency evolution: ambition and technology. The ambition<\/strong> is clear\u2014teams want to raise creative standards, drive effectiveness, and be recognised not for cost-saving, but for strategic value<\/strong>.

At the same time, automation and AI are reshaping the landscape. While hype suggests a revolution, reality is more cautious. \u201cMost brands are still at very early stages, running pilot projects,\u201d Patrick says. But the implications are profound. Many of the production-heavy tasks that in-house teams were built to handle could soon be automated or offshored.

There\u2019s a focus shift happening with in-housing. The future model is likely to be a lean<\/strong>, senior core team<\/strong> of creatives, producers, and strategists with deep brand knowledge, \u201cconducting the orchestra\u201d of partners and technologies around them.

In that world, the agencies that thrive won\u2019t be the ones promising lower cost or faster turnaround. Their edge will come from turning brand intimacy into creative advantage\u2014and proving they are indispensable to the business.<\/p>

Continuing the Conversation<\/strong><\/h2>

This is the first of three articles from our session with Patrick, each exploring a different theme we touched on, giving space to unpack the insights in a way that is easy to follow.

If you\u2019d like to watch the whole conversation straight away, you can find the full recording below.<\/p>

This is the first of three articles from our session with Patrick, each exploring a different theme we touched on, giving space to unpack the insights in a way that is easy to follow.

If you\u2019d like to watch the whole conversation straight away, you can find the full recording below.<\/p> \"\"

Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107<\/p>

Community and Event Manager<\/p>

Related articles<\/h2> \"\"

Interviews<\/p>

BenchPress 2025 – Key Findings<\/h2> <\/a> \"\"

Interviews<\/p>

Bold Session Recap – From Service to Value: Unlocking Real Business Model Change<\/h2> <\/a> \"\"

Interviews<\/p>

Bold Session Recap \u2014 Operational Excellence for Agencies and Services Providers: Expert Tips<\/h2> <\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Once built to save money and churn out assets, in-house agencies are no longer just the \u201cservice department.\u201d In our latest Bold Session with Patrick Burgoyne, we\u2019re discussing how they\u2019re stepping into a bigger role, using their inside knowledge of the brand to shape strategy and raise creative ambition.","protected":false},"author":59,"featured_media":632,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"es_utils_meta_schema":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interviews"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nHow In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions - Bold<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Once built to save money and churn out assets, in-house agencies are no longer just the \u201cservice department.\u201d In our latest Bold Session with Patrick Burgoyne, we\u2019re discussing how they\u2019re stepping into a bigger role, using their inside knowledge of the brand to shape strategy and raise creative ambition.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Bold\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-03T12:48:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-15T09:46:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1260\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#\/schema\/person\/79a0e8e30d68062fd201094867973e06\"},\"headline\":\"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-03T12:48:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-15T09:46:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/\"},\"wordCount\":11,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Interviews\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/\",\"name\":\"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions - Bold\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-03T12:48:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-15T09:46:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#\/schema\/person\/79a0e8e30d68062fd201094867973e06\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png\",\"width\":2400,\"height\":1260},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/\",\"name\":\"Bold\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#\/schema\/person\/79a0e8e30d68062fd201094867973e06\",\"name\":\"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a93e2b9cda9c21b965ff5a63060f82ff59b5816db8b1237cab0f7be31eaa8c56?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a93e2b9cda9c21b965ff5a63060f82ff59b5816db8b1237cab0f7be31eaa8c56?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a93e2b9cda9c21b965ff5a63060f82ff59b5816db8b1237cab0f7be31eaa8c56?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107\"},\"jobTitle\":\"Community and Event Manager\",\"worksFor\":\"Productive\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/author\/mirnasarjanovic\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions - Bold","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions","og_description":"Once built to save money and churn out assets, in-house agencies are no longer just the \u201cservice department.\u201d In our latest Bold Session with Patrick Burgoyne, we\u2019re discussing how they\u2019re stepping into a bigger role, using their inside knowledge of the brand to shape strategy and raise creative ambition.","og_url":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/","og_site_name":"Bold","article_published_time":"2025-10-03T12:48:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-15T09:46:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2400,"height":1260,"url":"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/"},"author":{"name":"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107","@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#\/schema\/person\/79a0e8e30d68062fd201094867973e06"},"headline":"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions","datePublished":"2025-10-03T12:48:11+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-15T09:46:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/"},"wordCount":11,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png","articleSection":["Interviews"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/","url":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/","name":"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions - Bold","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png","datePublished":"2025-10-03T12:48:11+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-15T09:46:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#\/schema\/person\/79a0e8e30d68062fd201094867973e06"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png","width":2400,"height":1260},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/bold-session-recap-patrick-burgoyne\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How In-House Agencies Went from \u2018Cheaper, Faster\u2019 to Leading Creative Ambitions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#website","url":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/","name":"Bold","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/#\/schema\/person\/79a0e8e30d68062fd201094867973e06","name":"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a93e2b9cda9c21b965ff5a63060f82ff59b5816db8b1237cab0f7be31eaa8c56?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a93e2b9cda9c21b965ff5a63060f82ff59b5816db8b1237cab0f7be31eaa8c56?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a93e2b9cda9c21b965ff5a63060f82ff59b5816db8b1237cab0f7be31eaa8c56?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Mirna Sarjanovi\u0107"},"jobTitle":"Community and Event Manager","worksFor":"Productive","url":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/author\/mirnasarjanovic\/"}]}},"featured_image":"https:\/\/website-assets.productive.io\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/09\/Open_Graph-Rethinking_In-House_Agencies.png","category":"Interviews","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/59"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=601"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/601\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":659,"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/601\/revisions\/659"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/632"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/productive.io\/bold\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}